SAN BERNARDINO, Calif. (AP) — A Pennsylvania armored car company has settled its lawsuit that accused the San Bernardino County sheriff of illegally seizing over $1 million in cash it was transporting from medical marijuana businesses.
The settlement for no financial compensation announced Friday allows Empyreal Logistics to resume services after two transports of money were stopped and cash was seized in November and December, The Sun of San Bernardino reported.
Deputies said in a search warrant that there was probable cause a felony had been committed when the vehicle was stopped Nov. 16 and $700,000 was seized.
Although California is one of 37 states that allow medical use of marijuana and one of 18 that legalized its recreational use, the drug remains illegal under federal law.
Because big banks and credit card companies have shunned the industry, it largely operates on a cash basis. As a result, some businesses have turned to armored cars to transport large quantities of cash.
In a statement, the sheriff’s department said it recognized Empyreal acted in good faith.
“Both sides also acknowledge that Empyreal is part of the solution to help with financial transparency and that San Bernardino Deputies are not highway robbers as previously reported in the media,” the statement said.
The company previously reached an agreement in which participating federal law enforcement agencies, including the FBI and Drug Enforcement Administration, agreed to return the money.
Empyreal CEO Deirdra O’Gorman said the company sued in federal court because its state-licensed cannabis customers and financial institution clients operate legally.
Related Articles
Builders damage protected areas in climate-weary Puerto Rico
Judge rejects Trump suit against Twitter over ban
Court rejects challenge to Rep. Greene’s eligibility
Son of NY judge gets 8 months for Capitol riot actions
Daunte Wright’s mom detained after filming traffic stop
“Now that the funds have been returned and after meeting with the sheriff, we are confident that we can continue serving state-legal businesses without future disruptions,” O’Gorman said in a statement.
Under federal civil forfeiture laws, if law enforcement had been entitled to seize the money as proceeds of a crime, San Bernardino County would have been able to keep 80% of the cash and the federal government would get the rest.
Most Popular
Fact-checking ‘2000 Mules,’ the movie alleging ballot fraud
Dear Abby: I don’t know what to tell my youngest son about who his father is
Miss Manners: If I’m alone in the kitchen, is this still inappropriate?
Ask Amy: I receive these photos every day, and I want it to stop
Ask Amy: They sent a rude letter about our presents
Bay Area is California’s COVID hotspot as cases rise again
Dear Abby: Our house stinks, and she says there’s nothing she can do
Miss Manners: I said yes to being maid of honor before I heard the bride’s odd plan
Baseball comes full circle as SF Giants honor Buster Posey, the newest Little League coach
Ask Amy: Should I tell them their 4-year-old needs therapy?
Trending Nationally
Twitter Goes Viral With False Claims That Amber Heard’s Testimony Are Lines From MoviesBoeing To Move Corporate Headquarters To Virginia, WSJ ReportsTurboTax Owner To Pay $2.5M To Colo. Residents For Deceiving People Into Paying For Free ServicesNo More S’mores: Is This The End Of Campfires In Colorado?House Prices Drop In One-third Of U.S., Realtor Stats Say
0 comments